Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Ethics
There is nothing illegal Peer-to-peer, and nothing to do with the illegal exploitation of files to distribute. What is illegal, the use of these networks and their software to download material, copyright.
It is not always clear, which is still subject to copyright, but you can absolutely sure everything again, as in recent chart hits or new computer games, can not be copied law with P2P software. Blockbuster movies will also be subject to copyright, but there are many movies, specially designed for free distribution.
There are many new artists, the peer-to-peer, in order to know itself. There are many computer games, P2P networks, to try to before fixing the error and the general conditions of sale. This is one aspect of the use of P2P to me that the moral of these systems is not the legality.
The reasons for compliance with the restrictions of copyright are well known. Copyright is an artist for the protection of plagiarism and illegal copying. If every copy of every piece of music or a movie every free online service such as peer-to-peer, and authors and artists is not their money. This would mean that the distribution of the entertainment industry, and I can understand that argument.
Thus, no mistake. I am not that man should be allowed to break the law, and I agree that copyright should be illegal and must be punished. My argument is against the film and music industry and their poor morale in the campaign for the fines for copyright infringement of the child while tolerance and, in some cases positively encouraging, lawbreaking, obscene and improper conduct and trafficking of illicit drugs, by the way-called artists who make money.
What Sicken me is the number of pop-stars and complain about us grumble against the law, while others snort on their line. Once they comply with the legislation, which may be called to learn more about others who do not. Many forget where they came from and how they celebrated.
Have you ever heard that you find interesting online? Have you ever seen a trace of an unknown artist and inspired, he suggests you to learn more about the artist? I have. I have something of a young girl named Amy Winehouse about three years ago. It was illegal, but I loved, and I go over and their work. I found they had an album “Frank” and I bought – purchased Please note that it is not downloaded!
The idea that I wish is that I have not heard on a peer-to-peer and download the track, I have not bought the album and all their work since. OK, it seems a little Alki and perhaps into drugs, but it is a great singer. P2P helped a fan and some sales so why should they want that I am arrested? Perhaps too many of these egotistical superstars forget who ultimately paid for it and helped them, which, if unknown! Many people have downloaded a track or two, then bought a ticket for the Live-Act.
Who’s the hardest: the pearl of the push-Junkie in a workplace or school of the child to download a title of his favorite band, it can not find in his music, record ? Even if he can find one, it probably can not afford the obscene price to pay for artists can afford their drugs or drinks or whatever.
It is where morality is a problem with me. While large companies not better for the cleaning of its own shares, and the Superstars, like for children, copying tracks Peer-to-peer? How can they fault on offenses against copyright, then they pay the filthy sex and drugs during junkies and gun-totin ‘grunt of waste that music is today?
When they stop against the law itself, and the incentive to go to sales, I can hear, and move their food court. A few of the so-called stars use these services to Internet advertising, itself known? Why, then, to agree to the RIAA and its school of tactics to be followed for children with a service for the promotion.
It would be criminal if the RIAA were the great men, the fate of the copying and sale of thousands of movies and albums, as they continuously on eBay or in almost all bars in the country. But no, these big boys are ignored. They are too difficult to follow, and children to repression. Children whose mothers have to struggle to find money for the payment of fines. You can not afford to buy overpriced CDs for their children obscene “may anniversaries, if the money to pay massive fines ($ 30,000 – $ 150,000).
The moral of the film and the music industry is open to question, and we can all see the brain dead drug leads selfish examples for people to inform them to pay, on behalf of the so-called entertainment on our screens every day. Once respect for law, decency and begin an example for the youth of the world – if the display of morals and a few good models for our children is, if I delete the copy MP3 Rocket or Limewire. In any case, I just, as it should be used to find out what’s new and popular and if I have something, what I like I download for it, then go and buy this album. This should not be illegal but it is.
If they want people arrested, leaving the children alone and consortia, the amount of money by copying and equipment sales on downloading peer-to-peer. It is not the law, I have problem is the hypocrites, the MPAA and the RIAA in progress and their dependents artists break.
Leave a Reply